Tags
american college of chest physicians, deep vein thrombosis, Health, Hip Replacement, joint replacement, Medicine, Patient, pulmonary embolism, Royal Hobart Hospital, science, surgery, Thrombosis, university of tasmania
Thromboprophylaxis after joint replacement misses targets | Rheumatology Update.
Thromboprophylaxis after joint replacement misses targets
16 July, 2012 Tony James

Less than 5% of Australian patients having hip or knee arthroplasty receive guideline-recommended therapy to prevent venous thrombosis, a study at the Royal Hobart Hospital has concluded.
Ms Corinne Mirkazemi, from the University of Tasmania School of Pharmacy, and colleagues reviewed the records of 300 patients treated between 2007 and 2009.
There were two cases symptomatic deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism occurring during the initial hospital admission and another six cases after discharge (but all within one month of surgery). The overall incidence of 2.7% was similar to that reported in other studies.
“All inpatients received pharmacological thromboprophylaxis, predominantly injectable anticoagulants,” the researchers said. However, only 37% continued to receive treatment after discharge.
The accepted guidelines at the time of the study were those of the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP). The most common departure from the guidelines was an inadequate duration of therapy, which was recommended to continue for at least 10 days after knee arthroplasty and 28 to 35 days after hip arthroplasty.
The NHMRC released guidelines on thromboprophylaxis in hospital patients in 2009, after data collection for the Hobart study was completed. It acknowledged that surgeons were often reluctant to persist with treatment because of the perceived and actual risks of major bleeding.
“In response, the Arthroplasty Society of Australia released an article with recommendations for surgeons to conduct risk assessments for each patient,” the researchers said.
The Society suggested that aspirin, or no chemo-prophylaxis, combined with mechanical prophylaxis might be appropriate for some patients with a relatively low risk of thrombosis.
Lack of consensus on optimal care meant that many patients failed to receive thromboprophylaxis conforming to any of the current guidelines, Ms Mirkazemi and colleagues said.
“Implementation of guidelines requires that more be done than simply publishing them,” they concluded.
Internal Medicine Journal. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2012.02864.x
Related articles
- Patient undergoes four joint replacement surgeries – Times Of India (earlsview.com)
- Knee implants: more evidence needed? (earlsview.com)
- Joint Replacements For Baby Boomers (earlsview.com)
- Bacteria from your mouth might damage your joints (examiner.com)
- Call for information request for a scientific opinion on the safety of metal-on-metal joint replacements with a particular focus on hip implants| Scientific Committees (earlsview.com)
- SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS DATA PREMARKET APPROVAL APPLICATION P040033 SMITH & NEPHEW BHR BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING SYSTEMf (earlsview.com)
- Study Finds Joint Replacement Surgery At Risk Done At Hospitals With Low Surgical Volume (pinnaclelawsuit.typepad.com)
- Norfolk man’s legal action over hip replacements – Health – Eastern Daily Press (earlsview.com)
- ‘Toxic’ hip replacement fears – Health – Belfast Newsletter (earlsview.com)
Pingback: Introducing decision aids may lower surgery for arthritis | Science Codex « Earl's View
Pingback: Hip Replacement – Arthroplasty wound complications linked to oral anticoagulant use « Earl's View
Pingback: Australian Joint Registry Results – 2012 – MUST READ « Earl's View