Keller & Keller, Hip Implant Lawyers
Leading America’s Attorneys in the fight against DePuy.
Keller & Keller is only accepting cases involving DePuy implants at this time.
Our Hip implant Lawyers are at the cutting edge of Hip Implant litigation. Our lawyers speak about Hip implant cases to other lawyers at a national level. We
believe your fight against Johnson & Johnson is our battle. Our proven personal injury Lawyers have joined forces for the sole purpose of helping Depuy implant victims. Our Experience, Reputation and vast Results combine to form an effective adversary against a major surgical implant company.
Keller & Keller, are AV Rated by Martindale-Hubbell. An AV Rating shows that a lawyer has reached the height of professional excellence. He or she has usually practiced law for many years, and is recognized for the highest levels of skill and integrity.
Keller & Keller
2850 North Meridian Street
Indianapolis, Indiana 46208
Tel: (317) 926-1111
Fax: (317) 926-1411
Law firm profile
Another possible serious side-effect from the recalled DePuy ASR Hip Implant’s, is damage to the hip joint and damage to the surrounding tissues.
Since approximately 2008, there have been more than 300 complaints submitted to the U.S. FDA regarding the DePuy ASR Hip Implant devices.
Orthopaedic surgeons believe that the metal on metal (MOM) design of the DePuy ASR devices is a reason for the high failure rate of the implant. The metal on metal design can produce a great deal of metallic flakes and shards as the implant wears resulting in not only metallosis, but also damage to the surrounding joints and tissues.
As the DePuy ASR Hip Implant wears, the small metal shards and flakes that are produced move into the surrounding joints and tissues causing damage. When the process of metallosis occurs, the body attacks the metal flakes, and an enzyme is produced that can damage and harm the surrounding bones and joints. As a result, the joints become weakened and can result in more severe damage to the patient’s body.
Furthermore, there have been growing concerns that the damaged joints and surrounding tissues can make it even more difficult for the already low success rate of revision surgery to help the patient continue a normal, active life.
Dislocation or Loosening of DePuy Hip Implant
The recently recalled Johnson & Johnson DePuy ASR hip implant devices have been linked to a number of problems. One of the major problems that have been associated with the recalled Johnson & Johnson DePuy ASR Hip Implant Devices is that the hip implant can become loose or can dislocate from the patient during normal activities such as walking.
Dislocation of a hip occurs when the ball, the head of the femur, pops out of the socket, the pelvic bone.
When patients experience a hip dislocation, it is generally a posterior dislocation, or backwards dislocation. During a posterior dislocation, the hip ball pops out of the socket and the hip will be left in a fixed location inwards towards the body.
The hip can also pop out of the pelvic socket in an anterior dislocation or forward dislocation. If this type of dislocation occurs, the individual will be left with their hip and leg in an outward position twisting away from the body.
Regardless of the type of hip dislocation, when the hip pops out of socket, it is immediately extremely painful. Patients are unable to move the leg and are at a great risk of further serious bone, muscle, nerve and tissue damage. Do not try to move the person if possible and seek medical attention and treatment as soon as possible. Only a doctor or medical professional will be able to properly diagnosis and treat a hip dislocation.
The cause of a hip dislocation in a person who has not had hip replacement surgery takes a significant amount of force. To cause a hip dislocation, the hip ball has to be physically forced out of the pelvic socket due to an impact. Auto accidents, severe physical impacts during sports, falls and work-related accidents can create the force needed to pop a hip out of its socket.
However, individuals that received a recalled DePuy ASR Hip implant device are at a much, much higher risk of accidental hip dislocation due to the faulty design of the DePuy ASR device.
The lack of depth with the metal on metal (MOM) DePuy ASR hip devices has been noted by experts to be the leading factor in the dislocation or loosening of the hip implant. This risk is more likely to occur because the hip ball can slip out of the shallow hip socket much easier. The type of problem has been more common in female patients.
A very serious side-effect of the loosening or dislocation of the DePuy ASR hip implant device due to the shallow hip cup, is that when dislocation occurs, it can cause very severe damage to the surrounding muscles, tissues and bone structures of the patient. When the DePuy ASR hip implant becomes loose or dislocates, not only will the patient experience swelling, pain and discomfort, but the loose or dislocated implant can cause bone fractures or breaks.
Signs and symptoms of the DePuy ASR hip implant failing include, but are not limited to the following:
- Bone Fractures: When the DePuy ASR hip implant has failed or is failing, patients have been found to have sustained fractures to the bones surrounding the hip implant. Bone fractures are a good indicator that there may be something wrong with the implant.
- Dislocation of the DePuy ASR hip implant: If the DePuy ASR hip implant has become dislocated, the patient will experience severe pain and discomfort along with site location swelling. This should be treated immediately by a doctor or medical professional to prevent further damage.
- Loosening of the DePuy ASR hip implant: Some patients have reported that the DePuy ASR hip implant did not come fully out of the socket, but that they did experience very severe pain and tenderness in and around the hip area. Patients should contact their doctors as soon as possible to help minimize the amount of damage that the DePuy ASR hip implant could cause if it becomes fully dislocated.
The outcome for any of these side-effects due to a recalled DePuy ASR hip implant device is that the patients will experience these painful side-effects and will possibly have to undergo revision surgery or 2nd surgery to correct the problem(s).
The revision surgery is a corrective surgery that is even more difficult, requires as much if not more recovery time, is costly and is very painful for the patient.
If you or your loved one have a DePuy ASR Hip implant device and have experienced loosening or dislocation of the recently recalled DePuy ASR Hip implant devices, you probably have a lot of legal questions and need sound advice. For immediate assistance and help with your legal questions contact our attorneys immediately to discuss your legal options.
Metallosis occurs when the body’s immune system responds to a metal ions that result from the metal shavings and flakes that a metal on metal (MOM) replacement hip can produce. The body’s defenses see the metal implant as an alien object, and attempts to eliminate the perceived enemy by attacking the implant. As a result, the implant location becomes inflamed and can even develop scar tissue.
Whenever there is a metal rubbing on a metal, there are going to be small pieces that flake off and travel into the surrounding tissue areas of the body. These small flakes are the debris that set off the immune system response. As a result of the body’s immune system response, muscle, tendons, ligaments and even bone structures can be harmed. When the bone becomes damaged, the metal implant can start to loosen as well. This loosening of the implant can be very harmful, as it can cause bone fractures, infections and if it becomes too loose, even require another surgery to repair and/or replace the metal implant. This is called 2nd surgery or revision surgery and is very painful and requires lengthy recovery time.
A less frequent, but serious and painful side-effect patients have also experienced with the faulty, recalled Johnson & Johnson DePuy ASR hip implant devices is fluid build-up around the hip.
Doctors have patients that have reported fluid pockets near and around the hip area that can get as large as a softball. Doctors have to surgical drain the fluid pocket to relieve the stress on the hip joint and the pain the patient is experiencing as a result.
One possible explanation of the fluid build-up is the faulty metal-on-metal (MOM) design of the recalled DePuy ASR hip implant devices that Johnson & Johnson is being sued for. This MOM design has the risk of small metal shards or flakes being produced and entering the body around the hip implant. As a result, metallosis occurs. Metallosis transpires when the body’s immune system mounts an attack on what it sees as an enemy- the metal flakes from the faulty, recalled DePuy ASR implant.
Johnson & Johnson’s DePuy pulled its troubled hip implant system from the market earlier this year. The hip implant devices that are included in the recall are the ASR hip resurfacing system and the ASR XL Acetabular System. Johnson & Johnson has not advised all patients that received a recalled DePuy ASR implant to have the device removed, but has recommended that anyone who received a DePuy ASR hip implant to have a surgeon examine their hip implant for problems.
Johnson & Johnson is also encouraging individuals who have received a recalled DePuy hip implant to contact them to discuss. If you or a loved have received a DePuy ASR hip implant that is part of the recall, DO NOT CONTACT JOHNSON & JOHNSON OR DEPUY. Without knowing what your legal and health rights are, you could risk your legal and health benefits by contacting anyone associated with DePuy or Johnson & Johnson. Contact a qualified law firm that is handling DePuy ASR recalled hip cases immediately to explore your legal options.
Signs and Symptoms of Hip Implant Failure
What are the symptoms of total hip implant failure?
If you have a hip implant, there are several signs and symptoms to watch for if you think you may have a hip implant failure. The signs and symptoms patients generally report include, but are not limited to:
- Experiencing pain and discomfort in and around the hip
- Pain while walking, sitting, standing or even laying down
- Difficulty using the hip to walk, stand, bend or step
- Swelling and tenderness in and around the hip
- Decreased mobility and movement in and around the hip
- Bulged or prominent lump in and around the hip area that would indicate a dislocation
The mentioned signs and symptoms are not necessarily indicative of a hip implant failure, but should be reported to a doctor or medical professional immediately as it is possible that the hip implant has become loose. When the implant becomes loose, it can damage the bone and tissues surrounding it and should be taken very seriously.
The Australian Joint Registry, the 2nd largest registry of its kind in the world, issued several reports to DePuy dating back to 2007 through 2009 when the ASR devices were removed from the Australian market.
DePuy warned U.S. doctors in March 2010 that the ASR was prone to higher than normal early failure rates, but didn’t issue a full recall until August 2010 after the National Joint Registry of England and Wales research data showed that 1 in 8, or 12-13% of patients were needing revision surgery within 5 years.
Hip Revision Surgery
Definition of Hip Revision Surgery
Hip revision surgery (HRS) or 2nd surgery, is a surgical procedure that involves the removal of the previously implanted hip replacement device(s) and replacing with new hip devices. A consequence of a patient needing to have HRS can also include the use of bone grafts from the patient or from a donor to help stabilize and strengthen the hip area. This can be very painful and can increase the amount of recovery time.
Reasons a Patient Would Need Hip Implant Revision Surgery
Hip revision surgery (HRS) is performed for 4 main reasons:
- Relieving pain coming from the affected area/hip following hip replacement surgery.
- Bringing back mobility for the patient due to previous hip replacement surgery.
- To remove loose or damaged hip implant devices from hip replacement surgery that have become loose, dislocated or failed to prevent further pain and possible permanent harm.
- To replace old, worn out hip replacement implants.
Hip implant devices vary in the materials that they are manufactured, and this can play a role in the life and durability of a hip implant device and also, the possibility of the patient needing revision surgery.
Hip implant devices that contain parts made of polyethylene typically become loose because wear and tear on the prosthesis gradually produces tiny particles from the plastic that irritate the soft tissue around the prosthesis. The inflamed tissue begins to dissolve the underlying bone in a process known as osteolysis. Eventually, the soft tissue expands around the prosthesis to the point at which the prosthesis loses contact with the bone.
In general, a surgeon will consider revision surgery for pain relief only when more conservative measures, non-invasive procedures, such as medication and changes in the patient’s lifestyle, are not able to rectify the problems.
For some patients, a simple x-ray will show the need for revision surgery when the hip implant has been found to be loose or dislocated or if the hip implant is causing loss of bone tissue due to wearing.
Some patients may not feel pain and discomfort at this time, but will have to undergo revision surgery to preempt future problems and pain. However, most patients do report increasing pain in the affected hip and patient reported pain and discomfort is one of the first indications that revision surgery is necessary.
Demographics of Hip Revision Surgery Patients
The demographics of hip revision surgery patients are most likely going to be changing over the coming years. As more and more individuals live longer and more active life-styles, more and more individuals are going to require hip replacements and possibly hip revision surgery.
Recent improvements in the techniques surgeons use along with the ever-evolving hip implant devices are making revision surgery less of an outcome for individuals that receive hip replacements.
Currently, the information on who is having total hip replacement surgery and hip revision surgery is limited, but a study of Medicare patients found that there were 3-6 times more hip replacement surgeries than there were hip revision surgeries.
Description of Hip Revision Surgery Procedure
Hip revision surgery is hard to describe in general terms because the procedure depends on a set of factors unique to each patient. These factors include the condition of the patient’s hip and leg bones; the type of prosthesis originally used; whether the original prosthesis was cemented or held in place without cement; and the patient’s age and overall health. Unlike standard THR, however, hip revision surgery is a much longer and more complicated procedure. It is not unusual for a hip revision operation to take five to eight hours.
The most critical factor affecting the length of the operation and some of the specific steps in hip revision surgery is the condition of the bone tissue in the femur. As of 2003, defects in the bone are classified in four stages as follows:
- Type I. Minimal bone defects.
- Type II. Most of the damage lies at the metaphysic (the flared end of the femur), with minimal damage to the shaft of the bone.
- Type III. All of the damage lies at the metaphysic.
- Type IV. There is extensive bone loss in the femoral shaft as well as at the metaphysic.
The first stage in all hip revision surgery is the removal of the old prosthesis. The part attached to the acetabulum is removed first. The hip socket is cleaned and filled with morselized bone, which is bone in particle form. The new shell and liner are then pressed into the acetabulum.
Revision of the femoral component is the most complicated part of hip revision surgery. If the first prosthesis was held in place by pressure rather than cement, the surgeon usually cuts the top of the femur into several pieces to remove the implant. This cutting apart of the bone is known as osteotomy. The segments of bone are cleaned and the new femoral implant is pressed or cemented in place. If the patient’s bone has been classified as Type IV, bone grafts may be added to strengthen the femur. These grafts consist of morselized bone from a donor (allograft bone) that is packed into the empty canal inside the femur. This technique is called impaction grafting. The segments of the femur are then reassembled around the new implant and bone grafts, and held in place with surgical wire.
A newer technique that was originally designed to help surgeons remove old cement from prostheses that were cemented in place can sometimes be used instead of osteotomy. This method involves the use of a ballistic chisel powered by controlled bursts of pressurized nitrogen. The ballistic chisel is used most often to break up pieces of cement from a cemented prosthesis, but it can also be used to loosen a prosthesis that was held in place only by tightness of fit. In addition to avoiding the need for an osteotomy, the ballistic chisel takes much less time. The surgeon uses an arthroscope in order to view the progress of the chisel while he or she is working inside the femur itself.
After all the cement has been removed from the inner canal of the femur, the surgeon washes out the canal with saline solution, inserts morselized bone if necessary, and implants the new femoral component of the prosthesis. After both parts of the prosthesis have been checked for correct positioning, the head of the femoral component is fitted into the new acetabular component and the incision is closed.
In most cases, increasing pain, greater difficulty in placing weight on the hip, and loss of mobility in the hip joint are early indications that revision surgery is necessary. The location of the pain may point to the part of the prosthesis that has been affected by osteolysis. The pain is felt in both the hip area and the thigh when both parts of the prosthesis have become loose; if only the femoral component has been affected, the patient usually feels pain only in the thigh. As was mentioned earlier, however, some patients do not experience any discomfort even though their prosthesis is loosening or wearing against surrounding structures. In addition, a minority of patients who have had THR have always had pain from their artificial joints, and these patients may not consider their discomfort new or significant.
In general, diagnostic imaging that shows bone loss, loosening of the prosthesis, or wearing away of the joint tissues is an essential aspect of hip revision surgery—many orthopedic surgeons will not consider the procedure unless the x-ray studies reveal one or more of these signs. X-ray studies are also used to diagnose fractures of the hip or dislocated prostheses. In some cases, the doctor may order a computed tomography (CT) scan to confirm the extent and location of suspected osteolysis; recent research indicates that CT scans can detect bone loss around a hip prosthesis at earlier stages than radiography.
Infections related to a hip prosthesis are a potentially serious matter. Estimated rates of infection following THR range between one in 300 operations and one in 100. Infections can develop at any time following THR, ranging from the immediate postoperative period to 10 or more years later.
The symptoms of superficial infections include swelling, pain, and redness in the skin around the incision, but are usually treatable with antibiotics. With deep infections, antibiotics may not work and the new joint is likely to require revision surgery. One American specialist has said that the chances of salvaging an infected prosthesis are only 50/50.
Certain health conditions or disorders are considered contraindications for hip revision surgery. These include:
- a current hip infection
- dementia or other severe mental disorder
- severe vascular disease
- poor condition of the skin covering the hip
- extreme obesity
- paralysis of the quadriceps muscles
- terminal illness
Patients who are considered appropriate candidates for hip revision surgery are asked to come to the hospital about a week before the operation. X rays and other diagnostic images of the hip are reviewed in order to select the new prosthesis. This review is called templating because the diagnostic images serve as a template for the new implant. The surgeon will also decide whether special procedures or instruments will be needed to remove the old prosthesis.
Aftercare for hip revision surgery is essentially the same as for hip replacement surgery. The major difference is that some patients with very weak bones are asked to use canes or walkers all the time following revision surgery rather than trying to walk without assistive devices.
Factors that lower a patient’s chances for a good outcome from hip revision surgery include the following:
- Sex. Men are more likely to have poor outcomes from revision surgery than women, other factors being equal.
- Age. Older patients, particularly those over 75, are more likely to have complications following revision surgery.
- Race. African Americans have a higher rate of complications than Caucasian or Asian Americans.
- Socioeconomic status (SES). Patients with lower incomes do not do as well as patients in higher income brackets.
- Presence of other chronic diseases or disorders.
- Obesity. Many surgeons will not perform hip revision surgery on patients weighing 300 pounds or more.
- Genetic factors. Recent British research indicates that patients who carry an inflammation control gene known as TNF-238A are twice as likely to require replacement of a hip prosthesis as those who lack this gene.
Specific risks of hip revision surgery
Risks following hip revision surgery are similar to those following hip replacement surgery, including deep venous thrombosis and infection. The length of the patient’s leg, however, is more likely to be affected following revision surgery. Dislocation is considerably more common because the tissues surrounding the bone are weaker as well as the bone itself usually being more fragile. One group of researchers found that the long-term rate of dislocation following revision surgery may be as high as 7.4%.
In general, hip revision surgery has less favorable outcomes than first-time replacement surgery. The greater length and complexity of the procedure often require a longer hospital stay as well as a longer period of recovery at home . The range of motion in the new joint is usually smaller than in the first prosthesis, and the patient may experience greater long-term discomfort. In addition, the new prosthesis is not expected to last as long. The life expectancy of implants used in first-time hip replacement surgery is usually given as 10–15 years, whereas revision implants may need to be removed after eight to 10 years.
Hip Implant Revision
What is hip revision surgery?
Hip revision surgery is a procedure that an individual undergoes to remove and replace the previous hip implant.
Hip revision surgery can be required for a number of reasons:
- The hip implant wears out
- Hip implant becomes loose
- The implant becomes damaged due to injury or fall
- The hip implant was faulty
- Metallosis- resulting in loosening of the implant
Hip revision surgery, or 2nd surgery, is one of the more frequent procedures that ortho surgeons perform. This is partly due to the vast number of individuals that require initial hip replacement surgery, but also because the implants do wear out and can be faulty.
The downside to revision surgery, is that it is very painful, requires just as much, if not more recovery time, and can even require bone grafts from the patient of from a donor.
- Crucial Documents Could Determine DePuy Hip Replacement Lawsuit Results (earlsview.com)
- ‘Metal on metal’ hip implants leave some recipients in pain, at risk (earlsview.com)
- Lawsuit Against DePuy Filed From Spain (earlsview.com)
- Hip-replacement recall hurts profits at Johnson & Johnson (earlsview.com)
- Australia – Hip surgery ruins lives (earlsview.com)