Food and Drug Administration, Fred Stone, Joan Lefkow, knee replacement, Multidistrict litigation, NexGen, Product Liability, UNited States
Zimmer NexGen Lawyers Set To Argue Over Consolidation of Knee Lawsuits
Published: July 20th, 2011
The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation has scheduled oral arguments for July 28, after a requet was filed last month by plaintiff Fred Stone to centralize the Zimmer NexGen litigation for pretrial proceedings in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois before Judge Joan Lefkow.
At the time the motion was filed, there were 28 lawsuits over Zimmer NexGen knee replacements filed in different 13 federal district courts throughout the United States. However, some Zimmer NexGen lawyers representing plaintiffs have suggested that hundreds of complaints are likely to be filed in the coming months over the artificial knee systems.
All of the lawsuits involve allegations that plaintiffs experienced problems following knee replacement surgery as a result of design defects with Zimmer NexGen components. Plaintiffs claim to have suffered catastrophic implant failures, often resulting in the need for revision surgery to remove or replace the implants because they failed far in advance of their projected lifespan. Zimmer allegedly downplayed and understated the risk of Zimmer NexGen knee problems.
Zimmer has opposed consolidation of the lawsuits, arguing that it will not promote the efficient litigation of the cases, as there are at least eight different artificial knee products made by the company that are included in various lawsuits. The medical device manufacturer argues that each Zimmer NexGen knee model would have to go through its own discovery process, and that consolidated discovery would be made harder by the requirement to protect the company’s trade secrets.
In support of the consolidation, plaintiffs filed a response with the MDL panel suggesting that Zimmer is attempting to mislead the court in their opposition. Lawyers for the plaintiffs indicate that the medical device manufacturer’s argument conflicts directly with their marketing materials, surgical technique brochures and their 510(k) FDA approval applications, where Zimmer claimed that the knee implants were all functionally equivalent so that they could bypass any extensive review and approval processes with the FDA.
Although the complaints involve a number of different implants, most of the problems have been linked to the Zimmer NexGen high-flex knee plants, Zimmer NexGen MIS tibial components and Zimmer NexGen LPS gender solutions, some of which were recalled last year.
Consolidation of the lawsuits over Zimmer NexGen knee replacement systems before one judge as part of an MDL is designed to reduce duplicative discovery, avoid contradictory rulings from different judges and to serve the convenience of the court, witnesses and parties. While the pretrial management of the cases in an MDL is often managed similar to how a Zimmer NexGen class action lawsuit would be handled, each claim will still remain an individual lawsuit.
Tags: Illinois, Knee Replacement, Product Liability, Zimmer, Zimmer Knee Replacement, Zimmer NexGen
- Problematic Zimmer NexGen Knee Replacement Faces Criticism (zimmerkneelaw2.wordpress.com)
- Complications From Zimmer Products (zimmerkneelaw2.wordpress.com)
- Zimmer Status And What They Are Doing (zimmerkneelaw2.wordpress.com)
- Northern Indiana is the major medical products manufacturing centre for the World (earlsview.com)
- Patient Victory in Wisconsin Court Over DePuy ASR Hip Recall Litigation (prweb.com)
- Pain in knee after total knee replacement a year ago. What are the options? (zocdoc.com)
- Double Knee Replacement Surgery (zimmerkneelaw2.wordpress.com)
Pingback: A Zimmer NexGen UK Patient – Metal Sensitivity « Earl's View
Pingback: Wireless data collected directly from patients during normal physical activities could enable the development of better knee implants « Earl's View
Pingback: First Blended Vitamin E Total Knee Replacement in the United States « Earl's View
Pingback: Advances in Knee Replacement Surgery for Active Baby Boomers « Earl's View
Pingback: Profit rises 23 percent at Zimmer « Earl's View
Pingback: Zimmer Holdings’ CEO Discusses Q2 2011 Results – Earnings Call Transcript « Earl's View
Pingback: Zimmer Hip Replacement Lawsuit in New Jersey « Earl's View
Pingback: Tiger Woods: Why a knee replacement is out… « Earl's View
Pingback: Zimmer NexGen CR-Flex Porous Femoral Component Lawsuit Filed in Illinois « Earl's View
Pingback: Knee Replacement Surgery « Earl's View
Pingback: Zimmer Knee Recall Lawsuits « Earl's View
Pingback: Zimmer NexGen CR-Flex Porous Femoral Component Complaints « Earl's View
Pingback: Zimmer Knee Replacement Lawsuit « Earl's View
Pingback: Zimmer NexGen MIS Tibial Component Recall « Earl's View
Pingback: Zimmer Recalls NexGen Knee Replacement Component « Earl's View
Pingback: Zimmer NexGen Knee Lawsuits Consolidated? « Earl's View
Pingback: Zimmer Durom Cup Recall? « Earl's View
Pingback: Zimmer Knee Replacement for Women « Earl's View
Gloria Cadrette said:
Good write-up, I am regular visitor of one’s blog, maintain up the nice operate, and It’s going to be a regular visitor for a lengthy time. “Good nonsense is good sense in disguise.” by Josh Billings.
Pingback: Unusual Case – Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis After TKA Associated With Tibial Component Loosening « Earl's View
Pingback: Zimmer Goes After “Rumor Mongering” Law Firms « Earl's View
Pingback: Zimmer Targeting Legal Advertising in NexGen Knee Replacement Fight « Earl's View
Pingback: Zimmer Blinks First on Physician Payments « Earl's View
Pingback: Earl – Update – Hope I didn’t get the short straw – FDA Recalls Zimmer Trabecular Metal Modular Acetabular System « Earl's View
Pingback: Earl – Update – Surgeon Says Problem is only with Zimmer Metal on Metal « Earl's View