DePuy, DePuy Orthopaedics, Health, Hip Replacement, Johnson, Maryland, Medicine, Nevada, Patient, science, UNited States
DePuy ASR Hip Implant Settlements Reached Prior To Jury Trial.
DePuy ASR Hip Implant Settlements Reached Prior To Jury Trial
The first ever DePuy ASR hip implant cases set for a jury trial inNevada has recently settled. It was supposed to be the first courtroom battle in the Counrty of patients with the defective ASR hip replacement against Johnson & Johnson subsidiary DePuy Orthopaedics, manufacturer of said hip implant. In December later this year, a Las Vegas Nevada state court judge was scheduled to preside over a jury trial of three plaintiffs against DePuy Orthopaedics for problems that the DePuy ASR hip replacement caused.All three of the patients had their ASR hip devices removed and replaced (revised).
However, in what is breaking news, that Nevada trial is no longer going to go forward as originally scheduled because the parties have recently agreed to a confidential settlement.
December 2012 was to be the first time that Johnson & Johnson subsidiary DePuy Orthopaedics was going to appear in court and explain what caused their hip product to create so many problems for patients who had their product implanted. This DePuy ASR hip implant settlement ends any showdown that was supposed to occur inLas Vegas. Like many settlements involving larger corporations like Johnson & Johnson, the terms of this settlement remain confidential. It is unfortunate that without the threat of a trial, the defendants DePuy and J&J has not compensated harmed patients that have had to undergo surgery to replace the defective device that they manufactured.
While the December 2012 trial is no longer moving forward given the settlement, there is another jury trial set by a Maryland state court judge set to begin in January 2013. The Maryland trial is also on behalf of three patients with recalled DePuy ASR hip implant that had to be replaced. In the event that a settlement is not reached prior to January 2013, Johnson & Johnson subsidiary DePuy Orthopaedics will have to explain what caused the defective hip product.
Both the December 2012 lawsuit and the January 2013 lawsuits were filed because Johnson & Johnson subsidiary DePuy, led thousands of patients with damaged hips to believe that their now recalled ASR Hip Replacement System, which uses a metal-on-metal device, would improve the pain and mobility of their hip. However, the danger of a metal-on-metal device has proven to be just as harmful as a damaged hip, if not more so in many cases based on our investigations. The implant contains the elements cobalt and chromium, which can be hazardous, and promote an inflammatory response that damages the surrounding tissue and bone. Shards of this metal have been known to grind off of the ASR hip implant damaging surrounding tissues and muscles, resulting in an increased level of these dangerous metal ions in the body. This can cause intense leg, hip, or groin pains, and in many cases patients have reported pain to the point of immobility.
To date there are more than 8,000 claims pending in the federal court and state courts. Childers, Schlueter & Smith, LLC is a leading firm in Georgia handling and litigating DePuy ASR hip implant claims. To date, our office has filed more than 160 individual claims on behalf of Georgians and other ASR victims from around the County. It is unclear how many trials will have to be tried before DePuy and J&J will step up to do the right thing and acknowledge the harms and misery created by there ASR hip implant products and further agree to compensate the victims for the past, present and future harms expected from this recalled device.
For more information or assistance please visit CSSfirm.com or call us at 404-419-9500 for assistance or any questions in preserving a claim before any potential statute of limitations may run.
- DePuy Hip Implant Claim Update: August 13, 2012 – Maryland Injury Lawyer Blog (earlsview.com)
- DePuy Hip Recall Attorneys Release Consumer Protection Guide: ‘What Every DePuy Hip Patient Needs to Know About Broadspire’ (earlsview.com)
- US Drug Watchdog Will Now Help All Recipients of the Recalled DePuy ASR Hip Implant Get to the Best Possible Attorneys Even if the Hip Implant Has Not Yet Failed (prweb.com)
- US Drug Watchdog Now Urges All DePuy Pinnacle Hip Implant Recipients To Call Them For The Names Of The Best Attorneys Because Of Premature Failures Of This Hip Implant (prweb.com)
- US Drug Watchdog Now Urges All Recipients Of A Recalled DePuy ASR Hip Implant To Call Them For The Names Of The Best Possible Attorneys Before The Deadline Passes (prweb.com)
- Three Quarters of Metal-on-Metal Hip Failures Occur in First Two Years, Study – DePuy Hip Replacement Lawsuit Information Site (earlsview.com)
- DePuy Defective Hip Implant Claims | eLocal (elocallawyers.com)
Pingback: J&J Said to Pay $600,000 to Settle First Suits Over Hips – Businessweek « Earl's View
Pingback: New Surgical Approach Allows for Outpatient Total Hip Replacement « Earl's View
Pingback: First DePuy Hip Replacement Lawsuits Settled for $200,000 Each « Earl's View
Pingback: Johnson & Johnson unit recalls bone putty | Fox News « Earl's View
Pingback: ‘Toxic’ hip replacement fears – Health – Bognor Regis Observer « Earl's View
Pingback: Hip damages claim rejected — Irish Medical Times « Earl's View
Pingback: Johnson & Johnson settles US hip replacement cases | Irish Examiner « Earl's View
Pingback: GOOD NEWS —Smith and Nephew sees a decline Birmingham hip implant business « Earl's View
Pingback: Stem cell-powered implant set to revolutionise orthopaedic surgery « Earl's View
Pingback: Solicitor says DePuy case may affect 600 in Cork | The Cork News « Earl's View
Pingback: Patients take on hip firms – Health – The Star « Earl's View
Pingback: Why some metal hip replacements fail | Chemistry World « Earl's View
Pingback: Metal-on-Metal Hip Trials Scheduled for 2013 – Florida Mass Tort Attorneys, Lawyers | Searcy Mass Torts « Earl's View
Pingback: Will a 2-year statute of limitations defense curb J&J’s DePuy hip lawsuits? | MassDevice – Medical Device Industry News- page 1 « Earl's View
Pingback: No cancer rise in hip implant patients – Behind The Headlines – Rutland and Stamford Mercury « Earl's View
Pingback: Lawsuits over hip implants filed against Stryker in Texas, New Jersey « Earl's View
Pingback: Plaintiffs look to depose new Johnson & Johnson CEO Gorsky in DePuy ASR lawsuit | MassDevice – Medical Device Industry News « Earl's View
Pingback: SCARY – Study finds elevated levels of cobalt and chromium in offspring of patients with metal-on-metal hip implants « Earl's View
Pingback: Engineering a Better Hip Implant « Earl's View
Pingback: YAHOO — Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Lawsuit Filed Over Metal Poisoning – AboutLawsuits.com « Earl's View
Pingback: Australia – TGA Information for Health Professionals – Metal-on-metal hip replacement implants « Earl's View
Pingback: Metal-on-Metal hip Implants Can Corrode | FDA Reports « Earl's View
Pingback: Australia – Stuart Cain DePuy Tragedy Continues… « Earl's View
What firm handled the L.V. Nevada case ?
Fortunately I happend upon this bit of info
Right on time ,as I’ve been courted by other
Firms out of my home state of NV and even
Had a contract FedEx overnight w/overnight
Return envelope payed & addressed to a NYC
Firm. If I had signed that contract I would have been forced to travel to NY for any settlement or trial, which explains the all total sum of …. Now let’s be honest & real about
It ….. A 40/60 split w/my having to incur any
and all cost be it travel or medical etc.in NYC.
Hopefully nobody is foolish enough to fall for
Predatory soliciting like this and I’m relieved
To have found and read this article which confirmed what I had suspected.
So again , can somebody please tell the name
Of the L.V. NV. Firm that settled out of court?
Please and Thank you…..