Post-Approval Studies for Smith & Nephew BHR – NOT USEFUL
Post-Approval Studies.
Post-Approval Studies
–
Post-Approval Studies
- In January 2005, the oversight responsibility of the Post-Approval Studies Program was transferred to the Division of Epidemiology (DEPI) of the Office of Surveillance and Biometrics (OSB)/Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH).
- The CDRH Post-Approval Studies Program encompasses design, tracking, oversight, and review responsibilities for studies mandated as a condition of approval of a premarket approval (PMA) application, protocol development product (PDP) application, or humanitarian device exemption (HDE) application. The program helps ensure that well-designed post-approval studies (PAS) are conducted effectively and efficiently and in the least burdensome manner.
- CDRH has established an automated, internal tracking system that efficiently identifies the reporting status of active PAS studies ordered since January 1, 2005 based on study timelines incorporated in study protocols and agreed upon by the CDRH and applicants. This system represents CDRH’s effort to ensure that all PAS commitments are fulfilled in a timely manner.
- In addition, CDRH launched this publicly available webpage to keep all stakeholders informed of the progress of each PAS. The webpage displays general information regarding each PAS, as well as the overall study status (based on protocol-driven timelines and the adequacy of the data) and the applicant’s reporting status for each submission due.
Links
Contact Information
Julie Unger
Project Manager, Post-Approval Studies Program
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Ave
WO66-4206v Silver Spring, MD
20993-0002
Phone: (301) 796-6134
Fax: (301) 847-8140
julie.unger@fda.hhs.gov
|
General |
Application Number |
P040033 |
Protocol Approved |
05/09/2006 |
Study Name |
US Study |
Study Status |
Progress Adequate |
General Study Protocol Parameters |
Study Design |
Prospective Cohort Study |
Study involve follow-up of premarket cohort (Y/N) |
No |
Data Source |
New Data Collection |
Comparison Group |
No Control |
Analysis Type |
Analytical |
Study Population |
Transitional Adolescent B: 18-21 yrs, Adult: >21 |
Detailed Study Protocol Parameters |
Study Design Description |
The study design is a multi-center, single arm, prospective cohort study. |
Study Population Description |
Study population is as per device indication. Patients who underwent Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) System,  |
Sample Size |
The sample size is 350 patients. |
Data Collection |
Study endpoints include Harris Hip Score and device survival. |
Followup Visits and Length of Followup |
Patients will undergo clinical and radiographic examinations for the first five years of follow-up with  |
|
US Study Schedule
|
|
|
|
6 month report |
11/07/2006 |
11/13/2006 |
Overdue/Received |
1 year report |
05/09/2007 |
05/08/2007 |
On Time |
18 month report |
11/07/2007 |
11/05/2007 |
On Time |
2 year report |
05/08/2008 |
05/06/2008 |
On Time |
3 year report |
07/08/2009 |
07/06/2009 |
On Time |
4 year report |
05/08/2010 |
05/06/2010 |
On Time |
5 year report |
07/07/2011 |
08/29/2011 |
Overdue/Received |
6 year report |
05/07/2012 |
05/07/2012 |
On Time |
7 year report |
05/07/2013 |
|
|
8 year report |
05/07/2014 |
|
|
9 year report |
05/07/2015 |
|
|
10 year report |
05/06/2016 |
|
|
|
Show All Studies
Post-Approval Studies
–
Post-Approval Studies
- In January 2005, the oversight responsibility of the Post-Approval Studies Program was transferred to the Division of Epidemiology (DEPI) of the Office of Surveillance and Biometrics (OSB)/Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH).
- The CDRH Post-Approval Studies Program encompasses design, tracking, oversight, and review responsibilities for studies mandated as a condition of approval of a premarket approval (PMA) application, protocol development product (PDP) application, or humanitarian device exemption (HDE) application. The program helps ensure that well-designed post-approval studies (PAS) are conducted effectively and efficiently and in the least burdensome manner.
- CDRH has established an automated, internal tracking system that efficiently identifies the reporting status of active PAS studies ordered since January 1, 2005 based on study timelines incorporated in study protocols and agreed upon by the CDRH and applicants. This system represents CDRH’s effort to ensure that all PAS commitments are fulfilled in a timely manner.
- In addition, CDRH launched this publicly available webpage to keep all stakeholders informed of the progress of each PAS. The webpage displays general information regarding each PAS, as well as the overall study status (based on protocol-driven timelines and the adequacy of the data) and the applicant’s reporting status for each submission due.
Links
Contact Information
Julie Unger
Project Manager, Post-Approval Studies Program
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Ave
WO66-4206v Silver Spring, MD
20993-0002
Phone: (301) 796-6134
Fax: (301) 847-8140
julie.unger@fda.hhs.gov
|
General |
Application Number |
P040033 |
Protocol Approved |
05/09/2006 |
Study Name |
UK Study |
Study Status |
Progress Adequate |
General Study Protocol Parameters |
Study Design |
Prospective Cohort Study |
Study involve follow-up of premarket cohort (Y/N) |
No |
Data Source |
New Data Collection |
Comparison Group |
No Control |
Analysis Type |
Analytical |
Study Population |
Transitional Adolescent B: 18-21 yrs, Adult: >21 |
Detailed Study Protocol Parameters |
Study Design Description |
The study design is a single arm, cohort study. |
Study Population Description |
Study population is as per device indication. Patients who underwent Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) System,  |
Sample Size |
The sample size is 350 patients. |
Data Collection |
Study endpoints include OSHIP scores and device survival. |
Followup Visits and Length of Followup |
At the time of PMA submission, all subjects had passed their 5 year post-implantation anniversary.  |
|
UK Study Schedule
|
|
|
|
2 year report |
05/22/2008 |
05/16/2008 |
On Time |
3 year report |
07/08/2009 |
07/06/2009 |
On Time |
4 year report |
05/08/2010 |
05/06/2010 |
On Time |
5 year report-final report |
07/07/2011 |
07/05/2011 |
On Time |
6 year report |
05/07/2012 |
|
Overdue |
|
Show All Studies
Like this:
Like Loading...
Related
Pingback: Premarket Approval (PMA) Database – BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) SYSTEM « Earl's View
Pingback: www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dockets/05p0440/05p-0440-c000001-01-vol2.pdf « Earl's View
Pingback: Wright Medical’s Response to Smith & Nephew’s Response to WMT request to Deny BHR PMA « Earl's View
Pingback: FDA Defense of its Decision to Grant PMA to Smith & Nephew’s BHR… « Earl's View
Pingback: Attachments to Wright Medical’s request to Deny PMA to Smith & Nephew BHR « Earl's View
Pingback: FDA, Summary Minutes, Meeting of the Orthopedic and Rehabilitation Devices Advisory Panel, Open Session, Hilton Washington D.C. North, Gaithersburg, MD, at 12 (Sept. 8, 2005) « Earl's View
Pingback: SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS DATA PREMARKET APPROVAL APPLICATION P040033 SMITH & NEPHEW BHR BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING SYSTEMf « Earl's View
Pingback: Smith & Nephew BHR – Food and Drug Administration, HHS « Earl's View
Pingback: SMITH & NEPHEW BHR – FDA Papers – Appendix G: Summary of MoM Hip Resurfacing Post-Approval Studies « Earl's View
Pingback: Outcomes of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: A Systematic Review « Earl's View
Pingback: Governmental Oversight of Potentially Dangerous Medical Devices – US Politics Today « Earl's View
Pingback: FDA to guide device makers on marketing application – chicagotribune.com « Earl's View
Pingback: Press Announcements > FDA outlines plans to provide earlier feedback on device product submissions « Earl's View
Pingback: Smith & Nephew’s BHR PMA approval by the FDA despite lack of scientifically valid trials and BHR Conflict of Interest « Earl's View
Pingback: Smith & Nephew BHR FDA-required Post-Approval Studies « Earl's View
Pingback: FDA to help medical device sales with expanded pre-market feedback program « Earl's View
Pingback: FDA Aims To Smooth Premarket Review process | Bloomberg BNA « Earl's View