| BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) SYSTEM
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
|
30-DAY NOTICE
|
S021 |
Jul 27, 2011 |
| BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING SYSTEM (BHR)
SMITH&NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS
|
POSTAPPROVAL PROTOCOL OR MODIFICATION TO A PROTOCOL
NORMAL 180 DAY TRACK NO USER FEE
|
S019 |
Apr 01, 2011 |
| BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) SYSTEM
SMITH&NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS
|
LABELING CHANGE – INSTRUCTIONS
SPECIAL(IMMEDIATE TRACK)
|
S020 |
Mar 16, 2011 |
| BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) SYSTEM
SMITH&NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS
|
LABELING CHANGE – INSTRUCTIONS
SPECIAL(IMMEDIATE TRACK)
|
S016 |
Oct 13, 2010 |
| BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) SYSTEM
SMITH&NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS
|
CHANGE DESIGN/COMPONENTS/SPECIFICATIONS – COMPONENT
REAL-TIME PROCESS
|
S015 |
Mar 09, 2010 |
| BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) SYSTEM
SMITH&NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS
|
PROCESS CHANGE: MANUFACTURING
135 REVIEW TRACK FOR 30-DAY NOTICE
|
S013 |
Dec 31, 2009 |
| BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) SYSTEM
SMITH&NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS
|
LABELING CHANGE – OTHER
SPECIAL(IMMEDIATE TRACK)
|
S014 |
Dec 11, 2009 |
| BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING SYSTEM, REFLECTION CERAMIC ACETABULAR HIP SYSTEM
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
|
PROCESS CHANGE: MANUFACTURING
135 REVIEW TRACK FOR 30-DAY NOTICE
|
S012 |
Oct 07, 2009 |
| BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING SYSTEM
SMITH&NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS
|
LABELING CHANGE – INSTRUCTIONS
REAL-TIME PROCESS
|
S011 |
Jun 09, 2009 |
| BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) SYSTEM
SMITH&NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS
|
CHANGE DESIGN/COMPONENTS/SPECIFICATIONS – COMPONENT
REAL-TIME PROCESS
|
S010 |
Feb 13, 2009 |
| BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) SYSTEM
SMITH&NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS
|
LABELING CHANGE – INSTRUCTIONS
REAL-TIME PROCESS
|
S008 |
Jan 12, 2009 |
| BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING SYSTEM
SMITH&NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS
|
PROCESS CHANGE: MANUFACTURING
30-DAY NOTICE
|
S009 |
Dec 18, 2008 |
| BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) SYSTEM
SMITH&NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS
|
CHANGE DESIGN/COMPONENTS/SPECIFICATIONS – COMPONENT
NORMAL 180 DAY TRACK
|
S006 |
Nov 13, 2008 |
| BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) SYSTEM
SMITH&NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS
|
LOCATION CHANGE: MANUFACTURER
NORMAL 180 DAY TRACK NO USER FEE
|
S003 |
Oct 14, 2008 |
| BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) SYSTEM
SMITH&NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS
|
PROCESS CHANGE: MANUFACTURING
135 REVIEW TRACK FOR 30-DAY NOTICE
|
S007 |
Jun 20, 2008 |
| BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) SYSTEM
SMITH&NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS
|
POSTAPPROVAL PROTOCOL OR MODIFICATION TO A PROTOCOL
NORMAL 180 DAY TRACK NO USER FEE
|
S004 |
Oct 01, 2007 |
| BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) SYSTEM
SMITH&NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS
|
CHANGE DESIGN/COMPONENTS/SPECIFICATIONS – COMPONENT
REAL-TIME PROCESS
|
S005 |
Jun 27, 2007 |
| BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) SYSTEM
SMITH&NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS
|
LOCATION CHANGE: MANUFACTURER
NORMAL 180 DAY TRACK NO USER FEE
|
S002 |
Feb 23, 2007 |
| BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) SYSTEM
SMITH&NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS
|
DESIGN CHANGE – MINOR
REAL-TIME PROCESS
|
S001 |
Oct 13, 2006 |
| BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) SYSTEM
SMITH&NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS
|
|
|
May 09, 2006 |
Earl's View 
Pingback: Premarket Approval (PMA) Database – BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) SYSTEM « Earl's View
Pingback: www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dockets/05p0440/05p-0440-c000001-01-vol2.pdf « Earl's View
Pingback: Wright Medical’s Response to Smith & Nephew’s Response to WMT request to Deny BHR PMA « Earl's View
Pingback: FDA Defense of its Decision to Grant PMA to Smith & Nephew’s BHR… « Earl's View
Pingback: Attachments to Wright Medical’s request to Deny PMA to Smith & Nephew BHR « Earl's View
Pingback: SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS DATA PREMARKET APPROVAL APPLICATION P040033 SMITH & NEPHEW BHR BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING SYSTEMf « Earl's View
Pingback: Smith & Nephew BHR – Food and Drug Administration, HHS « Earl's View
Pingback: SMITH & NEPHEW BHR – FDA Papers – Appendix G: Summary of MoM Hip Resurfacing Post-Approval Studies « Earl's View
Pingback: Outcomes of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: A Systematic Review « Earl's View
Pingback: Meeting of the Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Devices Advisory Panel June 27-28, 2012 Metal-on-Metal Hip Systems « Earl's View
Pingback: Early Clinical Experience With the Use of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing System | Orthopedics « Earl's View
Pingback: Metal on metal hip resurfacing using the BHR, Cormet 2000, or Conserve Plus devices does not meet CTAF criteria 3-5 for safety, efficacy and improvement in health outcomes for patients as an alternative to total hip arthroplasty « Earl's View
Pingback: Hip resurfacing: A boon for Boomers or too risky? « Earl's View
Pingback: METAL ON METAL TOTAL HIP RESURFACING AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY « Earl's View
Pingback: Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Devices Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee Day 1 « Earl's View
Pingback: Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Devices Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee Day 2 « Earl's View
Pingback: UK – S&N BHR HELL – Trevor (General Practitioner) Gets Rude Response from Smith & Nephew « Earl's View
Pingback: Smith and Nephew – time to come clean – more facts, less spin « Earl's View