Tags
DePuy, Hip Replacement, Johnson, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, National Health Service, NHS, Patient, Sunday Telegraph
All-Metal Hip Replacements: Not All Patients Informed of Recall | Qmed.
All-Metal Hip Replacements: Not All Patients Informed of Recall
British orthopedics officials have written surgeons, fearing not all patients who got “metal-on-metal” hip replacements know they were recalled.
The British Orthopaedic Association has notified surgeons because they are concerned some of the 40,000 patients who got “metal-on-metal” hip replacements never got the recall notice.
Professor Joe Dias, the association’s president, told The Sunday Telegraph the letters said the records held by DePuy — a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson — show that just over one-third of the patients with the devices were recorded as having participated in the recall.
Dias said it was possible other patients had been contracted by hospitals and undergone checks, without their details being centrally logged but that he was concerned some patients were never contacted.
The surgeon said private hospitals and large National Health Service units seemed to have been thorough in contacting patients, it was less clear if small NHS units had.
“My worry would be about cases where surgeons have retired, and no-one is following up on the patients they treated,” Dias told the Telegraph.
The implants’ manufacturers cannot contact patients directly, because they do not have access to their records.
The metal-on-metal implants were considered stronger and were often given to younger patients, but friction between the metal ball and cup causes minuscule metal filings to chip off and seep into the blood causing inflammation, destroying muscle and bone, Dias said.
There are concerns fragments containing cobalt and chromium could put the kidneys and other organs at risk. In 2010, patients were told to be checked annually for at least five years.
Copyright 2012 United Press International, Inc. (UPI). Any reproduction, republication, redistribution and/or modification of any UPI content is expressly prohibited without UPI’s prior written consent.
Related articles
- Health warning over Metal on Metal hip implants – Telegraph (earlsview.com)
- Kiwis told of implant poison risk – Metal on Metal (earlsview.com)
- Tens of thousands of British patients with metal hip replacements at risk of being poisoned (earlsview.com)
- Huddersfield patients affected by faulty hip replacements face more surgery – Local West Yorkshire News – News – Huddersfield Examiner (earlsview.com)
- UK hospital recalls all Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Patients… (earlsview.com)
- Health warning over hip implants (telegraph.co.uk)
- Johnson & Johnson Takes $3 Billion Charge for Hip Recall – NYTimes.com (earlsview.com)
- Will Flawed All-Metal Hip Replacements Cost J&J and Zimmer $5 Billion? – Forbes (earlsview.com)
- J&J Reimburses Thousands to Australians in Recall Claims | DePuy Hip Replacement Lawsuit Information Site (earlsview.com)
- Fears over hip replacements (independent.co.uk)
Pingback: What’s hip and what’s hype in hip surgery by Mr Warwick Radford | totalhealth « Earl's View
Thank you for the information. However, knowing these adversities are becoming more and more apparent, with patients complaining of various pains,aches etc. r: their metal on metal hip device. Why aren’t all metal on metal hip devices shelved until these unknown adversities are resolved ?
2.) why is this treated like a secret, why are there TV adds, news and magazines stating in big bold lettering: METAL ON METAL hips maybe hazordous to one’s health. If you have a MOM, and are experiencing any type of problem with your hip device contact your surgeon ASAP, to help avoid possible devastating results: like mine for example: I was a healthy, happy, successfull business,etc 65 year old man, today I basically live in my wheelchair, as I can no longer walk. There is much more to my horror story, but you get my point.
Almost like with holding evidence??
Has anyone asked McMinn why his BHR is not in the same light as ASR, DePuy, and others that are made out of metal on metal, after all the BHR is metal on metal is it not ?
Respectfully,
Howard Sadwin
Pingback: Press release: MHRA updates advice for metal-on-metal hip replacements : MHRA « Earl's View
Pingback: Stuart’s Advice – Warnings to all metal on metal implant recipients! Don’t miss this! « Earl's View
Pingback: BBC News – Surgeons call for end to metal hip replacements « Earl's View
Pingback: Hip patients: Why weren’t we told? – National – NZ Herald News « Earl's View
Pingback: What is the Status of Biomet Metal on Metal Hip Replacements | PA Law Blogs « Earl's View
Pingback: Stuart’s Open Letter to Dr Graham Mercer, president of the AOA « Earl's View