Tags
Food & Drug Administration, GE Healthcare, hip, Smith & Nephew, Stryker, Stryker Corporation, Suzhou, UNited States
Smith & Nephew Restructures and Refocuses
Source: Orhopedic Design & Technology
The news that Smith & Nephew plc is combining its orthopedic reconstruction and endoscopy units is part of a larger shift that’s been taking place for the past few years. The company has actually been revising its focus since about 2008, but on a global scale. Industry executives are expecting similar announcements to be made on August 5, when CEO Olivier Bohuon is said to be presenting the company’s financial results for the first half of the fiscal year.
According to a company spokesperson, the new division will focus on serving customers in Smith & Nephew’s more established markets in the United States, Canada, Europe, Japan, Australia and New Zealand. However, the company is also increasing its focus in Brazil, Russia, India and China because of a higher growth potential, according to a company spokesman.
“In the last few years we have seen the markets around us change, some significantly,” Joseph Metzger, senior vice president of corporate communications, said. “Our established markets, especially in North America and Europe, are under pressure. At the same time emerging markets have huge potential. We are going to ensure we have a focused organization and allocate appropriate resources to seize these opportunities.”
The company has been preparing for the market change for several years: in 2007, the company announced that it would close its high-tech wound care dressing facility in Largo, Fla., and move production to Suzhou, China. The following year, Smith & Nephew announced that manufacturing facilities in China would be expanded to capitalize on the market’s growth. In 2010, the company began producing parts for artificial joints specifically for the Asian population at a 10,000- square meter facility in Beijing, China. Smith & Nephew also announced plans to train 5,000 surgeons in advanced orthopedic techniques at this time. The education initiative is still underway, and the company has four dedicated centers in China.
In the first quarter, Smith & Nephew’s international business grew 8 percent, compared to a 4 percent increase in the United States and a 1 percent increase in Europe. Combined, the orthopedic and endoscopy divisions made up about 90 percent of the company’s total sales in the United States that quarter, and 78 percent of its approximately $1 billion global sales.
In a separate statement, Metzger shared that “additional resource and focus will be given to the emerging markets of China, India, Brazil and Russia and other international markets.” Smith & Nephew’s geographic spread of revenue has made it somewhat of an attractive takeover target for larger corporations: Zimmer Holdings Inc., Stryker Corp., Johnson & Johnson and Biomet Inc. have all been named possible suitors.
Announcements made in the past several weeks by other companies might be an indicator that the industry as a whole shares Smith & Nephew’s viewpoint on the global marketplace, and that China currently is the hot commodity, GE Healthcare announced that it is moving the headquarters of its X-ray business from Waukesha, Wisc., to Beijing, and Boston Scientific Corp. announced that it plans to spend $150 million in the next five years building up its China presence.
Related articles
- Smith & Nephew’s Exclusive OXINIUM Material for Hip Replacement Implants Chosen for Premium Reimbursement in Japan (earlsview.com)
- History – Smith & Nephew Receives US FDA Approval For Ceramic-On-Ceramic Hip (earlsview.com)
- Sadwin Raises More Questions – Will They Ever Be Answered? (earlsview.com)
- Recent Knee Replacement Success (earlsview.com)
- Sadwin Doesn’t buy the BHR Story … (earlsview.com)
- Is Corin going to be swallowed up? (earlsview.com)
- Sadwin has a few other Pithy Points for the Orthopaedic “Big Guys”… (earlsview.com)
- Smith & Nephew turns attention to emerging economies to counteract tough European market (independent.co.uk)
- Smith & Nephew Highlights Advanced Wound Management Progress (prweb.com)
- Smith & Nephew Endoscopy Patent Infringement Case Against Arthrex Proceeds to Oregon Court on June 13 (benzinga.com)
Howard Sadwin said:
I haven’t read any articles from Smith & Nephew as to the results of their metal on metal research, nor have I read how they are working on the concerns of people as to metal ions and the impact they may have on us humans.
Their marketing is always pointed in the same direction: ” Market Share and Financing ” and not how they have solved any of the existing problems that do affect the quality of our lives. New is always great, but how do we know it really works and what are the short falls? Is complete honesty and disclosure out of the question with these medical device giants. I will have greater concerns for the people in third world countries that may have no idea what is going on today in the medical device world.
Why isn’t there enough of a concern to stop these manufacturers from using me,or you as their LAB RATS ?
Howard Sadwin
earlstevens58 said:
Hi Howard
either they have a very slick PR machine or they bury their victims – I run daily scans on Smith & Nephew and come up with zippo usually.
I keep digging.
Have a great day – to the extent possible!
PS – the Australian Joint Registry info has some interesting insights – but notice the fundamental dishonesty when they calculate percentage failure as a fraction of “total years” – that is the number of implants times the years before they were removed. Of course the absolute failure rate is considerably higher.
One of the things that has been concerning me about your situation is your surgeon’s role in this – fundamentally, as I read it, you had septic shock after the second replacement – this points to poor control of sterility and antibiotic regime. If I was him, I would be preparing for a big lawsuit from you for being a crap surgeon.
Earl
Pingback: U.S. government examining doctor kickbacks for medical devices « Earl's View
Pingback: Maryland – State’s health care professionals got millions in consulting fees « Earl's View
Pingback: Orthopedic companies settle DOJ probe, face SEC scrutiny; Medtronic loses a patent suit to Johnson & Johnson, releases new spinal device « Earl's View