Tags
DePuy, Food & Drug Administration, Health, Hip Replacement, hip resurfacing, Medical device, NephewSmith, surgery
Journal of Medical Case Reports | Abstract | Revision of hip resurfacing arthroplasty with a bone-conserving short-stem implant: a case report and review of the literature.
Revision of hip resurfacing arthroplasty with a bone-conserving short-stem implant: a case report and review of the literature
Journal of Medical Case Reports 2012, 6:249 doi:10.1186/1752-1947-6-249
Published: 20 August 2012
Abstract (provisional)
Introduction
Case presentation
Conclusions
Related articles
- Early Clinical Experience With the Use of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing System | Orthopedics (earlsview.com)
- ‘Toxic’ hip replacement fears – Health – Belfast Newsletter (earlsview.com)
- Hip resurfacing: A boon for Boomers or too risky? (earlsview.com)
- Metal on Metal Total Hip Resurfacing As an Alternative to Total Hip Arthroplasty (earlsview.com)
- ‘Toxic’ hip replacement fears – Health – Bognor Regis Observer (earlsview.com)
- All-metal hips ‘wear down faster’ – Health – Warwick Courier (earlsview.com)
- FDA Pre Market Approval (PMA) of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) System – P040033 (earlsview.com)
- Metal on metal hip resurfacing using the BHR, Cormet 2000, or Conserve Plus devices does not meet CTAF criteria 3-5 for safety, efficacy and improvement in health outcomes for patients as an alternative to total hip arthroplasty (earlsview.com)
- About Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants (earlsview.com)
- SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS DATA PREMARKET APPROVAL APPLICATION P040033 SMITH & NEPHEW BHR BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING SYSTEMf (earlsview.com)
Pingback: Stem cell-powered implant set to revolutionise orthopaedic surgery « Earl's View
Pingback: Clemson Knee Simulator to Help Improve Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty « Earl's View
Pingback: No cancer rise in hip implant patients – Behind The Headlines – Rutland and Stamford Mercury « Earl's View
Pingback: Jumbo cup in revision hip arthroplasty 53 cases with 84 months of follow-up – Orthopaedia Proceedings - Orthopaedia « Earl's View
Pingback: Journal Highlight: Differential distribution of cobalt, chromium, and nickel between whole blood, plasma and urine in patients after metal-on-metal (MoM) hip arthroplasty – Ezine – spectroscopyNOW.com « Earl's View
Pingback: Cementless Metaphyseal Fitting Anatomic Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearing in Patients Thirty Years of Age or Younger « Earl's View
Pingback: One- Versus Two-stage Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty | Orthopedics « Earl's View
Pingback: Nerve palsy associated with total hip replacement « Earl's View
Pingback: Smith & Nephew Birmingham hip resurfacing – THE PREVALENCE OF FAILURE « Earl's View
Pingback: EARLY CLINICAL FAILURE OF THE BIRMINGHAM METAL-ON-METAL HIP RESURFACING IS ASSOCIATED WITH METALOSIS AND SOFT TISSUE NECROSIS « Earl's View
Pingback: Interview with Derek McMinn and Ronan Treacy – Orthopaedic Product News « Earl's View
Pingback: New Zealand – Medical Devices – Medsafe Guidelines for MoM hips « Earl's View
Pingback: New Zealand – Medical Devices – Medsafe Guidelines for MoM hips « Earl's View
Pingback: Hip Replacement – Arthroplasty wound complications linked to oral anticoagulant use « Earl's View
Pingback: Ban ‘failing’ hip resurfacing implants for women, say surgeons | Mail Online « Earl's View
Pingback: Hip Resurfacing Draws Warning After Study Published in Lancet – NYTimes.com « Earl's View
Pingback: Hip Resurfacing Has High Rate of Failure: Study : Consumer News : Medical Daily « Earl's View
Pingback: Hip resurfacing ‘not suitable’ for women – Health – Halifax Courier « Earl's View
Pingback: The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery | Article « Earl's View
Pingback: Moving Toward Sex-Specific Surgery? The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery | Article « Earl's View
Pingback: Re: Mortality and implant revision rates of hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis: registry based cohort study | BMJ « Earl's View
Pingback: Low revision rate after total hip arthroplasty in patients with pediatric hip diseases. « Earl's View
Pingback: Australian Joint Registry Results – 2012 – MUST READ « Earl's View
Pingback: ‘Short stay’ hip arthroplasty patients show good results | Orthopedics « Earl's View
Pingback: Self-serving Smith & Nephew Caught Out? Mortality and implant revision rates of hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis: registry based cohort study | BMJ « Earl's View