Consider both imaging and symptoms before metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty revisions | Orthopaedics Today Europe.

Orthopaedics Today Europe, Issue 6

MANCHESTER — Surgeons can use MRI and ultrasound equipment to detect metallosis in potential metal-on-metal total hip replacement revision patients, but researchers from the United Kingdom have recommended taking patient symptoms into consideration as well, according to a recent presentation.

“Although ultrasound and MRI are useful in the treating of metal-on-metal patients, there is a significant percentage of hips that have pain with negative radiology findings,” Naveed Ahmed, MBBS, MSc, of Prince Charles Hospital in Merthyr Tydfil, United Kingdom, stated in his presentation at the British Orthopaedic Association Congress, here.

Ahmed and colleagues retrospectively examined imaging results from 25 hips (16 patients) between March 2011 and May 2012: 23 hips had ultrasound scans and 21 of these hips also had MRI scans preoperatively. The patients’ average age range was 37 years to 69 years. Ultrasound was done an average of 50 months after primary total hip replacement. The MRI and ultrasounds were reported by musculoskeletal radiologists. All patients had blood tests for cobalt and chromium levels, Ahmed said.

“During surgery, multiple samples were taken from the acetabulum, capsule, as well as tissue lining the femoral neck and sent for histopathology,” he said.

The researchers analyzed fluid collected from patients during revision surgery for evidence of metallosis. MRIs were positive for fluid collection in 16 patients, while ultrasound was positive in 18 patients.

Four patients had both negative MRI and ultrasound results, but were still revised due to pain and were found to have “histopathology positive metallosis,” according to Ahmed. The histopathologist involved in the study defined metallosis as the “presence of sheets of macrophages with dark brown pigmentation in the cytoplasm under polarized light,” Ahmed said. One patient had a positive ultrasound and negative MRI result; similarly, one patient had a positive MRI with a normal ultrasound, he said.

“MRI and ultrasound are useful in screening of hips with metal-on-metal arthroplasty,” Ahmed told Orthopaedics Today Europe. “Still there are a significant percentage of hips which have failed with negative radiology findings.” – by Jeff Craven

Reference:

Ahmed N. Paper #20. Presented at: British Orthopaedic Association Congress; Sept 11-14, 2012; Manchester.

For more information:

Naveed Ahmed, MBBS, MSc, can be reached at Gurnos Rd., Merthyr Tydfil CF47 9DT, United Kingdom; email: drnaveed75@yahoo.com.
Disclosure: Ahmed has no relevant financial disclosures.

Related articles

• Imaging, patient symptoms should be considered before metal-on-metal THR revisions | Orthopedics (earlsview.com)
• HIP | Chronic intoxication with cobalt following revision total hip arthroplasty (earlsview.com)
• Metallosis-induced Iliopsoas Bursal Cyst Causing Venous Obstruction and Lower-limb Swelling After Metal-on-metal THA | Orthopedics (earlsview.com)
• Leg-Length Discrepancy After Revision Hip Arthroplasty: Are Modular Stems Superior? (earlsview.com)
• FDA Executive Summary Memorandum – Metal-on-Metal Hip Implant Systems – June 27-28, 2012 Meeting (earlsview.com)
• ‘Short stay’ hip arthroplasty patients show good results | Orthopedics (earlsview.com)
• Self-serving Smith & Nephew Caught Out? Mortality and implant revision rates of hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis: registry based cohort study | BMJ (earlsview.com)
• Cementless Modular Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Younger than Fifty with Femoral Head Osteonecrosis: Minimum Fifteen-Year Follow-Up (earlsview.com)
• Australia – Zimmer Durom Acetabular Component (used in hip replacements) Withdrawn from Market (earlsview.com)
• Stryker Rejuvenate Hip Patient shows signs of Metallosis (earlsview.com)