Center for Devices and Radiological Health, FDA, Food & Drug Administration, Jeffrey Shuren, Medical device, PMA, Premarket Approval, Radiological Health
New FDA guidance on considerations used in device approval.
New FDA Guidance used in Device Approval
THURSDAY, MARCH 29. 2012; FDA NEWS RELEASE; For Immediate Release: March 27, 2012; Media Inquiries: Michelle Bolek, 301-796-2973, Michelle.Bolek@fda.hhs.gov; Consumer Inquiries: 888-INFO-FDA
New FDA guidance on considerations used in device approval, de novo decisions
Clinical data, risks, benefits and patient risk tolerance outlined in process
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration today published a first-of-a-kind guidance1 for medical device manufacturers, describing how the benefits and risks of certain medical devices are considered during pre-market review.
Premarket approval (PMA) is the FDA process of scientific and regulatory review used to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Class III medical devices. Class III devices are those that support or sustain human life, are of substantial importance in preventing impairment of human health, or which present a potential unreasonable risk of illness or injury. The de novo process is available for low- and moderate-risk devices that have been found not substantially equivalent (NSE) to existing devices.
When evaluating PMA applications or de novo petitions, the FDA relies upon valid scientific evidence to assess safety and effectiveness. Both clinical and non-clinical data play a role in FDA’s benefit-risk determinations.
The guidance includes a worksheet for device reviewers that incorporates the principal factors that influence benefit-risk determinations, such as the type, magnitude and duration of a risk or benefit, the probability that a patient will experience the risk, patient tolerance for risk, availability of alternative treatments, and the value the patient places on treatment.
outlines the systematic approach FDA device reviewers take when making benefit-risk determinations during the premarket review process
provides manufacturers a helpful tool that explains the various principal factors considered by the agency during the review of PMA applications, the regulatory pathway for high-risk medical devices, and de novo petitions, a regulatory pathway available for novel, low- to moderate-risk devices
describes an approach that takes into account patients’ tolerance for risks and perspectives on benefits, as well as the novelty of the device.
“This guidance clarifies this process for industry, which will provide manufacturers with greater predictability, consistency and transparency in FDA decision-making while allowing manufacturers and the FDA to use a common framework for benefit-risk determinations,” said Jeffrey Shuren, M.D., director of FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH).
The FDA will also increase the transparency of the decision-making processes by describing the worksheet analysis in the Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data for PMAs and the decision summary review memos for de novo decisions.
“In addition to bringing clarity to our decision making for industry, this guidance will provide our reviewers with uniform and consistent guidelines to assess probable benefits and risks,” said Shuren.
CDRH will train medical officers, review staff managers and device reviewers on the guidance to assure the guidance is applied consistently to submissions and petitions. CDRH reviewers will begin applying the guidance to incoming PMA and de novo submissions and to submissions already under review with decisions beginning on May 1.
The FDA is also developing external training modules to help industry and device sponsors understand how CRDH will apply the guidance.
- Medical Device ” The Senate Passes Unparalleled Medical Device User Fee Act (earlsview.com)
- Rottenstein Law Group Applauds FDA Device Chief’s Recommendation To Close Dangerous Loophole In Agency’s Medical-Device Approval Process (prweb.com)
- FDA PMA – how this hides the guilty and stops The Damaged and Suffering from getting Justice – Smith & Nephew (earlsview.com)
- Plaintiff’s Second Bite at the Apple Leaves a Sour Taste in Our Mouth (druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com)
- The Senate Passes Unparalleled Medical Device User Fee Act (depuyrecall.wordpress.com)
- FDA proposes new device ID system to boost recall efforts, and patient safety (medcitynews.com)
- CDISC Will Be Required by Kit Howard (edcdeveloper.wordpress.com)
- Restaurant Equipment and Supplies (foodservicewarehouse.com)
- Implications of the Medical Device Excise Tax on M&A (axialmarket.com)
- Medtronic Stent Graft Chosen By U.S. FDA For Innovative Program (medicalnewstoday.com)
Pingback: Premarket Approval (PMA) Database – BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) SYSTEM « Earl's View
Pingback: www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dockets/05p0440/05p-0440-c000001-01-vol2.pdf « Earl's View
Pingback: Wright Medical’s Response to Smith & Nephew’s Response to WMT request to Deny BHR PMA « Earl's View
Pingback: FDA Defense of its Decision to Grant PMA to Smith & Nephew’s BHR… « Earl's View
Pingback: FDA Proposes Device ID Regulations for Medical Dev – TMD – Today’s Medical Developments « Earl's View
Pingback: Governmental Oversight of Potentially Dangerous Medical Devices – US Politics Today « Earl's View
Pingback: FDA Faces Daunting Task as Health Apps Multiply | Sci-Tech Today « Earl's View
Pingback: FDA – User Fees for Medical Devices: Third Time Lucky? « Earl's View
Pingback: FDA to guide device makers on marketing application – chicagotribune.com « Earl's View
Pingback: Press Announcements > FDA outlines plans to provide earlier feedback on device product submissions « Earl's View
Pingback: FDA to help medical device sales with expanded pre-market feedback program « Earl's View
Pingback: FDA – Overview of Medical Device Regulation > Information about MDUFA III « Earl's View
Pingback: FDA Aims To Smooth Premarket Review process | Bloomberg BNA « Earl's View